|
TM
But email musings by 20-something on Israel-Palestine
is not good drama
By Lucy Komisar
This solo theater piece will be judged by two standards.
The first is political: are viewers convinced by its
arguments against Israeli policy in the West Bank and Gaza? Are they moved and
persuaded by the writings --- journal and emails -- of Rachel Corrie, a young
American, 23, who in 2003 was killed in Gaza by an Israeli bulldozer as
she tried to block it from knocking down a Palestinian home?
The second standard is artistic: is this a theatrically
exciting production?
The answer to the first depends on your politics. Rachel
was obviously naïve if she thought – and it’s the impression one gets -- that
the struggle by Palestinians is represented by the non-violent actions she took
part in. Whether the Israeli’s have the right to be in Gaza is something else.
The answer to the second is a pretty firm “no.” Putting
together teenage musings and 20-something activist’s emails home in this case
doesn’t work dramatically. The play is not helped by the fact that Megan Dodds
deals with teenage angst in Olympia, Washington, with the same level of earnest
intensity as she does with deadly confrontations in Gaza.
The story told in the monologue delivered by Dodds moves
from Rachel’s rather unexceptional teenage home life– encompassed by a bedroom
painted red and plastered with photographs -- to a trip to Russia that raised
her consciousness about the world. We learn about her peace and justice
activism, her feelings about boys and parents, and finally her decision to go to
Gaza and become part of a movement that involves foreigners and Palestinians in
nonviolent resistance against Israeli government actions. Now the set becomes
white concrete blocks pock-marked with bullet holes.
Rachel visits Palestinian homes that are targeted by
Israeli troops. She describes the Israeli tanks and watch towers and
checkpoints. She witnesses violence: “Today’s Demo. At least ten greenhouses
destroyed. Cucumbers, peas, olives, tomatoes….150-200 Men arrested. Shot around
them. Eat them. Six people in hospital.” She describes bulldozers destroying 25
greenhouses. She reports that an explosive broke the windows in a home where she
was having tea.
Based on the arguments of Israeli government critics and
supporters, the play will not change anyone’s mind. People will view Rachel
Corrie as a heroine or a naïf.
But as an artistic endeavor, the play is hampered by the
decision of Alan Rickman and Katharine Viner to build it only on Rachel’s
writings. Sometimes she displays a budding talent. She might have been a
successful novelist. She writes lines such as: “I have to grab the great big
flaccid flaps of my eyebrows and lift them off my cheekbones in order to see.”
Her words describe interior feelings and thoughts. However, what emerges is a
narrative with no sense of place.
“Nine Parts of Desire,” about Iraq under attack, was vivid
and exciting because writer-actor Heather Raffo created and portrayed a series
of characters that gave one a rich sense of being there. You flinched when bombs
went off.
But though Rachel talks about people she interacts with, we
never hear them. We hear only a foreign activist speaking to people of her own
western world. It is hard to imagine that she was really in the place she
describes. The most exciting part of the play is the genuine video of a
ten-year-old Rachel giving a classroom political speech about world justice.
Unfortunately, a political speech – the sum of her later thoughts – in this case
doesn’t make a play.
“My Name is Rachel Corrie,” Taken from the writings of
Rachel Corrie; edited by Alan Rickman and Katharine Viner. Starring Megan Dodds.
Directed by Mr. Rickman. Designed by Hildegard Bechtler.
A Royal Court Theater production at the Minetta Lane
Theater, 18 Minetta Lane, at Sixth Ave. & Macdougal St. Greenwich Village.
Tue-Sat 8pm; Sat & Sun 3pm; Sun 7pm. $25-$75. (212) 307-4100. Through Dec. 30,
2006. Running time: 1:30.
http://mynameisrachelcorrie.com.
by Stephen Cummiskey.
Back to TravelLady Magazine |