Travellady MagazineTM


DELIGHTS OF BELGIUM

by Janice Rossen

"Not bad," commented my husband, as we were strolling through the palatial 15th century house of Jan Gruuthuse in Bruges, "to be the top Spanish guy in the Netherlands." In an age of increasing "global village" thinking, it startles one to be in a country where the political and military struggles of several centuries ago appear in the very stones of the buildings. The Dukes of Flanders, I learned, once owned most of what is now The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg, and it was they who built dikes to drain the "flooded land" and make it habitable.

Most of the guide books I have read on the subject relate relevant facts about Belgium--and in this nationalistic context. The country is split between the Flemish (Dutch culture) and the Walloons (French), and the two languages are used in these different sections. The excellence of Belgian beer is invariably mentioned in all the guides, as an inducement to travel to this part of Europe, and the food generally has a good report as well. But in nothing that I read before visiting there could I get a very clear picture of a place that seemed to be . . . well, sort of Dutch and sort of French, though of course uniquely Belgian.

What happened first was like nothing so much as a Frank Capra film. Our first evening in Bruges, we were walking past one of the many restaurants, and through the window I noticed a man playing a violin. Closer inspection revealed another man seated at a keyboard, and a bass player as well. They formed one part of the compass, thumping and strumming and providing the foundation, while the violinist roamed around to various tables, bending and swaying to whatever melody he was coaxing from the strings. It was enthralling. They played with such verve!, smiling and laughing, and even carrying on a conversation between musical phrases with various diners. I have only seen this sort of thing done on the silver screen, when Jimmy Stewart and Jean Arthur were serenaded in a classy New York restaurant, and everything was in black and white.

This extremely fortunate chance, on our first evening, launched the first of many glorious meals during our sojourn in Belgium, which featured me ordering everything on the menu that sounded wonderful and my husband picking up the bill at the end and remarking how very reasonable it all was. This dual theme of contentment extended to several aspects of our trip: if you are relatively Europhile, two people of disparate tastes can be happy pursuing different interests in pretty much the same spot. I pondered Flemish art, while he thought about history. He went around galleries with the little museum headsets that tell you all about the paintings, and I flitted from spot to spot, just looking. He climbed to the top of the belfry while I went to the flea market.

We both ate extravagantly. Nearly every meal in Belgium seems to come 1) with frites included, and 2) in at least three courses. Our first evening (to return to the incredible violinist) featured a set course meal with a goat cheese salad followed by salmon (with frites) and a chocolate sundae. (I'm sure there is a much fancier name for this, the universal dessert of that part of the world, but I have forgotten it.) I have seldom seem that large a round of goat cheese being offered to one diner alone, and the salmon arrived with a bearnaise sauce and an entirely separate bowl of frites. It would be a mistake to think of these as French fries, though that is probably their technical definition. They seem a very superior way to prepare potatoes.

But I have not even begun to describe the salads which we usually ordered at lunch-time--this dish comprises a stern test of a nation's true relationship with food. Complexity and artistry perhaps characterize them the best: a salad with tuna or smoked salmon, say, (as denoted on the menu) would usually arrive with hard-boiled eggs, wedges of tomato, four or five different vegetables in tiny julienne strips, a few beets for colour, and finely-chopped parsley over the whole. (And, sometimes, an accompanying bowl of frites, with mayonnaise.) I must admit, we did drink beer with almost every meal. Duvel is one of the most well-known, which is sweet, rich, and dark--rather like crimson velvet with gold tassles. My own favorite was Trappiste Westmalle, which is dark, dark brown and deliciously foamy. My husband likes wheat beers, glowing, lyrical, and golden yellow (yet another pleasant divergence in taste).

Naturally, we spent one evening devoted intently to a pot of mussels, which was so enormous that it could have served the people sitting at the next table, as well. The mussels arrived in an enormous clear plastic globe, the top half of which was deftly overturned onto another base in order to hold the empty shells. They were steamed in white wine and swimming in large chunks of onion. We sat outside in a small courtyard, watching the other tourists roam past, examining restaurant menus posted outside, and enjoying the summer evening sunlight. In midsummer, dusk doesn't come until about 10:00 at night, which draws one outside to sit at a cafe table and reflect on the events of the day.

The only mild disappointment was a very fancy four-course chef's meal at 't Dreveken, which fell short only because it attempted to be much more refined than the natural Belgian genius for cooking seems to be. (The first course, a mound of smoked salmon large enough for a main dish, was the best, since it was the simplest presentation.) We also suffered, on this particular occasion, from the American Traveller's Curse--a calamity which overtakes everyone from time to time (and which I have no doubt we ourselves inflict on others). It consists of smugly settling down to a table in a foreign land, and suddenly realizing that the party at the adjoining table are not only talking English, but are insisting on expounding on their problems with roofing back in Ohio, or a quarrel which they have had with the tour guide on their last excursion. It is mortifying in the extreme.

Worse still is having to endure the comments that fellow Americans tend to make while viewing paintings in a museum. ("Doesn't the Frick have one of those?") The reason that this is the most harrowing experience to endure is that it reveals my own snobbishness--while schooling myself to stern silence, I am longing to say, "No, the one in the Frick is a Van Eyck." In fact, what all of this demonstrates is that we are all, as hangers-on at the tail end of a long tradition of Western civilization, extremely lucky: odd, angular, and just plain weird as much of Flemish art is, you can look at it with relatively little specialized knowledge and really see it. Realism--rather, exquisite detail--is a high value for the late medieval painters. They are mostly religious subjects, and therefore any given genre is instantly recognizable. In a Van Eyck painting, you can see the carpet fraying on its edges, or a minute reflection in a convex mirror. In a Rogier van der Weyden (I certainly am boasting), every fold on a woman's dress will be distinctly pleated in orderly rows. Shoes in these group portraits--along with elaborate headpieces--are a constant source of fascination. Each stone of a building or wall will be pricked out in precise, minute detail--although these painters make it look effortless. It is astounding.

Everyone who has been to Belgium speaks very knowledgeably about one particular altarpiece, "The Lamb of God" attributed to Van Eyck, which is in Ghent. Like most works of art that are spectacular, the only thing one can really say about it after viewing it is "c'est entendu." But of course; it is as magnificent as can be imagined. Moreover, (my usual helpless response to revelations like this), it is big. Somehow the scale dazzles, especially when coupled with the absolutely rigorous detail. The Musee des Beaux-Arts Royaux in Brussels is the same way (that is very big). And it is perhaps typical of Belgian culture that they resolutely close between noon and one o'clock. You can see the museum guards eating their lunch in the--what else?--excellent cafeteria downstairs. A glass of red wine, a superb salad, a bowl of perfectly cooked spinach (flavoured with a dash of nutmeg), followed by cappuccino and a small bar of noir, intensely dark chocolate, and you are ready to troop back upstairs and contemplate Bruegel and Bosch again. It is eminently civilized. The great thing is that it is done without any particular fuss.

The musicians who serenaded us that first evening never appeared again, though we looked for them every night. We did, however, come to know our hostess, the owner of the Rembrandt-Rubens Hotel, and Madame is a most impressive lady indeed. We learned that she deplores Dutch cuisine ("all very sweet sauces, made with peanuts," she insisted, shaking her head), and she has what is probably a medieval wall fresco in her sitting-room. The hotel itself was built in the 16th century, and you can see St. George killing that dragon in a stained-glass window, on your way down to breakfast every morning.

Bruges is a magical city, just as all of the guide-books promised. And somehow, it is the very intangibleness of that grace that renders it so appealing. It doesn't sound like very much, to say that it is a walled medieval city with some canals, some ornate brick buildings, and a few canals with swans, ducks and geese. Still, it is the unassuming naturalness of all of this sophistication that makes a visitor feel able to see it, to respond, to react with pleasure. You can sit outside late at night, among the strings of white lights across the courtyard, and feel a citizen of the centuries. If you like, it can even come with frites.

Janice Rossen has a passion for medieval cities, provencal cuisine, and Flemish paintings.

Back to TravelLady Magazine

 


Copyright 1995-2008 TravelLady Magazine